Tuesday 24 September 2013

Frustration with Upton Dene Residents Ltd; a new charging plan regarding tickets on my car



Posted to directors of Upton Dene residents Ltd

From
David
Upton Dene
Grange Rd
SM2 6TA

19/09/2013

To
The 7 directors of;
Upton Dene Residents Ltd


Amended charge list for Upton Dene Residents Ltd, starting from 23/09/2013.

Good morning.

As you are aware from past letters to you, I believe the board of directors, “No rights to parking” policy to be a violation of my lease. I have a right to park on my freehold without director’s permission because my lease gives me those rights and privileges.

I have made every effort to explain my rights to parking at Upton Dene but despite my efforts I have received 3 penalty notices todate and no legally documented explanations for the “no rights to parking”.

I do not feel the board of directors have taken seriously my points regarding this matter. Neither have they made any significant effort to reply to my questions. In fact, in a letter from the board, dated 25th of August 2013, the board stated that they, “…. deam this matter closed.”

The board’s decision to, “close this matter” 25 days into this new “no rights to parking” policy, with no explanation of the legal basis of this policy, amid my concerns that my rights and privileges have been violated, is irresponsible.

Your attempts to enforce a violation to my lease, is presenting a distorted picture of me to the Upton Dene community and to others who see my car ticketed. I am not in the wrong here, you are. I am defending my rights and privileges that my lease gives me. Upton Dene Residents Ltd, on the other hand is attempting to enforce a removal of those rights and privileges.

On June 27th,  2013, more than a month before you implemented your “no right to parking” at Upton Dene, I asked you to, “……clarify what legal basis they have (the directors) to go against the lease….”

I received no reply to this question.

The board of directors have mentioned in letters to shareholders, more than once, that they had taken “legal advice” on this matter. But despite these statements no legally documented position has been made available to shareholders.

In a letter to the board, dated September 9th 2013, I asked for a second time to see this “legal advice”, but the board of directors have ignored my request, again.

If the board of directors were so confident in the legal advice they received, then they should be confident enough to present that documentation to a shareholder on request.

In the boards 25th August letter to me you stated…."we will not be paying the charges you have detailed”.

My invoices are made up of charges for the use of my vehicle and the £10.00 a day charge is for the denial of my rights and privileges. Your contracted agent, Ace Security Services, enforces your decisions. They are authorised, wrongly, by you.

I am free to offer my services, in your case my vehicle. You want somewhere to display your agents’ documentation; my car is available at a price.

Clearly you have no grounds to enforce “No rights to parking” because my lease has already given me those “rights and privileges” for 950yrs.

I have stated my charges. You have used my services. It is your choice if you use those services or not. Invoice number 001, and future invoices, are payable.

I feel little effort is being made by the board to answer my questions. On the contrary, I feel they are ignoring them completely. I have made every effort to detail my rights to parking on Upton Dene in a clear manner and received almost no input from the board. It seems the board is distancing itself still further from my concerns.

In a letter dated 3rd September, a director wrote to me that she would be, “…..grateful that in future if you (david) have any correspondence for me or the board of directors that you post it through my letterbox and not knock on my door.”

I am beginning to think that no legal adviser was hired and no legal position was documented prior to the August 1st 2013 implementation of the “no rights to parking” policy. The board can easily, ease me from my doubts by giving me copies of the legal documentation they claim to have.

A resolution to this matter is not near. With this in mind, I am amending my charges for the use of my vehicle by “Upton Dene Residents Ltd” and its contracted agent “Ace security services”.

The charges are divided equally between “Upton Dene Residents Ltd” and “Ace Security Services”. Each of the two parties receives invoices accordingly.


On the 23rd  of September 2013 the new charges below come into effect

Amended charge list to Upton Dene Residents Ltd.
*Daily charge for parking rights removal
£10.00 per day.
Penalty notice (and others) Attachment charge to/on vehicle (per item)
£500.00
Daily charge per attachment
£250.00 per day
Attachment removal charge (per item)
£500.00
Moving of my vehicle without my written permission
£1000.00

*The daily charge will not be made on you when ALL signage is removed from Upton Dene. When the signage is removed it will be clear that the rights in the lease have been re-established and your role in the enforcement of “no rights to parking” ended.

These changes will be reflected in future invoices from the date stated above.


I also request, FOR THE THIRD TIME, information from the board of directors regarding the “legal advice” you received regarding the changes to our parking rights. I would like to see a copy of that legal advice from your legal advisor. I understand that you don’t believe that a change in the lease took place on 1st August 2013 because, from your position, shareholders never had a right to parking 32 years ago when the lease was written. Nonetheless I would like to see a copy of the drafted legal argument, not an explanation by directors, but the actual legal document in full that is used to enforce a “No rights to parking” at Upton Dene.


And for the second time I request to have the general breakdown of the types of vehicles you will permit (in both senses of the word) to park on Upton Dene property. For example I don’t believe you will give a permit to a householder who owns a commercial van of any type, even if it is the sole vehicle of a household. The types of vehicles in question are; small commercial van, larger transit type van, four wheel drive, SUV type, large estate cars etc. 


Regards
David

1 comment:

  1. You have good articles here! If anyone here is looking for a loan @ 2% rate in return to buy a home or other financing needs, I want you to contact Mr Pedro On pedroloanss@gmail.com When I was introduced to Mr. Pedro at the market watch seminar, I was entering the market as a first time buyer. Naturally,my needs were a bit different and I had loads of questions. Before he sent me my pre-approval letter, he called to speak with me about what it meant and what could change. He made himself available to me at pretty much any hour via email and texts. He was very responsive and knowledgeable. He’s also very straightforward. I explained to him what my expectations were in terms of closing time and other particulars. He said he would meet those expectations but he surpassed them. I closed so quickly my realtor and the seller of course were excited about that. But as a buyer I appreciated being walked through the process of Mr Pedro loan offer. From pre-approval to closing- the journey was so seamless and I consider myself lucky because I’ve heard horror stories. I recommend him to anyone looking for a loan. Everything was handled electronically expediently and securely   

    ReplyDelete